By J.J. Spivey, G.W. Roberts, B.H. Davis

This lawsuits comprises the papers awarded on the ninth overseas Symposium on Catalyst Deactivation, held in Lexington, KY, united states, on 7-10 October 2001.

Show description

Read or Download Catalyst Deactivation 2001, Volume 139: Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium, Lexington, KY, USA, October 2001 PDF

Best general & reference books

Writing Reaction Mechanisms in Organic Chemistry

Presentation is obvious and instructive: scholars will learn how to realize that the various reactions in natural chemistry are heavily comparable and never self sustaining proof wanting unrelated memorization. The e-book emphasizes that derivation of a mechanism isn't really a theoretical approach, yet a method of employing wisdom of different comparable reactions and response stipulations to the hot response.

Extra resources for Catalyst Deactivation 2001, Volume 139: Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium, Lexington, KY, USA, October 2001

Sample text

The reduction of catalysts can lead to the chemisorption of 12DCP on metallic species, which enhances the adsorption capacity. Coke formation affects both adsorption and catalytic properties. With coke deposition, the pore volume and surface area can be reduced to great extent, resulting in a lower adsorption 28 capacity and in catalyst deactivation. In addition, coke formation decreases the selectivity to propene. The yielded HC1 might induce the re-dispersion of metallic species at the beginning of the reaction.

L. Ito, US Patent No. 5453557 (1995). 4. Q. G. L. L. O'Young, J. Phys. , 99 (1995) 758. 5. F. D. Madiera, Ind. Eng. Chem. , 32 (1993) 2969. 6. D. Chen, A. P. Rebo, K. Moljord and A. Holmen, Appl. Catal. A, 137 (1996) L1. 7. D. P. Rebo, K. Moljord and A. Holmen, Chem. Eng. , 51 (1996) 2687. 8. D. P. Rebo, K. Moljord and A. Holmen, Ind. Eng. Chem. , 36 (1997) 3473. 9. D. P. Rebo, K. Moljord and A. Holmen, Ind. Eng. Chem. , 38 (1999) 4241. 10. K. C. C. S. Rumschitzki, J. , 169 (1997) 455. 11. E. A.

It has been suggested that the production of ethylene occurs by hydrogen transfer between a monolayer of acetylene, strongly adsorbed on the metal surface, and acetylene interacting with this monolayer [7,8]. This strongly adsorbed monolayer can suffer polymerization to give a layer of hydrogenated coke. A probable mechanism is given in Scheme 2. Therefore, according to the suggested mechanisms, the presence of three atom arrangements to selectively hydrogenate acetylene into ethylene is not desirable.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.73 of 5 – based on 12 votes