By Alexander Gallas

Within the Thatcherite Offensive, Alexander Gallas presents a class-centred political research of Thatcherism. Drawing upon Greek kingdom theorist Nicos Poulantzas, he demanding situations either mainstream and significant debts of British politics within the Eighties and 90s. He indicates that Thatcherism’s sucess and novelty, certainly its harmony as a political undertaking, lay within the indisputable fact that the Thatcher governments profoundly shifted category family in Britain in favour of capital and restructured the associations underpinning type domination. in accordance with Gallas, it used to be an essential component of the Thatcherite undertaking to without delay interfere in labour kinfolk, to deprive staff in their skill to forge coalitions, and to ruin militant exchange unionism.

Biographical note
Alexander Gallas, PhD (2010), Lancaster college, is Assistant Professor of Politics on the college of Kassel. he's editor of the worldwide Labour magazine and often writes on issues reminiscent of the country, type, labour family members and British Politics. His courses contain studying Poulantzas (Merlin, 2011).

Readership
Students, lecturers, activists and alternate unionists drawn to Marxism, kingdom thought, type, British politics, the Thatcher period, the labour stream and neoliberalism.
Reviews
"In this brilliantly leading edge, theoretically refined, methodologic best friend self-reflexive, seriously engaged, and conjuncturally delicate examine, Alexander Gallas presents a great research of Thatcherism as a category venture. encouraged significantly via the later Poulantzas and drawing on incisive case experiences, the writer analyses successive phases within the improvement Thatcherism (and Blairism); the dialectic of offensive and protective phases and steps in school fight; and the relative good fortune of attacks at the strength of prepared labour in creation and relative failure of makes an attempt to reconfigure the broader financial regime to advertise accumulation and social team spirit. Exemplary in its readability, this method also will encourage different paintings in conjunctural research and struggles over type hegemony and domination."
Bob Jessop, Lancaster collage

Show description

Read or Download The Thatcherite Offensive: A Neo-Poulantzasian Analysis PDF

Best communism & socialism books

The Bending Cross: A Biography of Eugene V. Debs

Enable the folk take middle and wish far and wide, for the go is bending, the dead night is passing, and pleasure cometh with the morning. —Eugene Debs in 1918 Orator, organizer, self-taught student, presidential candidate, and prisoner, Eugene Debs’ lifelong dedication to the struggle for a greater international is chronicled during this remarkable biography by means of historian Ray Ginger.

Requiem for Marx

Requiem for Marx by means of Yuri N. Maltsev (Paperback - Jun 1993)

Extra resources for The Thatcherite Offensive: A Neo-Poulantzasian Analysis

Example text

73 Finally, Jessop et al. 74 Overall, they demonstrated that Thatcherism was not successful on any of the three levels. In conclusion, the Hall-Jessop debate is characterised by a single profound disagreement: the extent of popular consent to Thatcherism. Leys argues that the gradual acceptance of Thatcherite policies by the Labour Party is a good indicator of Thatcherism having attained hegemony; the gang of four see proof for the absence of Thatcherite hegemony in opinion polls, the nonexistence of Thatcherite popular organisations and, most importantly, the incapacity of the Thatcherites to roll out an expansive growth pattern and redesign state institutions accordingly.

101. Ibid. Ibid. Jessop et al. 1988, p. 177. Jessop 1990, p. 211. The term ‘two nations’ entered the British political discourse thanks to Benjamin Disraeli, a nineteenth-century Tory Prime Minister. Disraeli wrote a political novel called Sybil, or the Two Nations in 1845. In it, a character refers to ‘the rich and the poor’ in Britain as ‘two nations; between whom there is no intercourse and no sympathy; who are ignorant of each other’s habit, thoughts, and feelings, as if they were dwellers in different zones, or inhabitants of different planets; who are formed by a different breeding, and fed by a different food, are ordered by different manners, and are not governed by the same laws’ (Disraeli 1845, pp.

The workers as sellers can claim that their status as free owners of labour power must not be compromised through overwork and exhaustion, that is, that they must be able to re-sell it if the existing labour contract is cancelled. Put differently, they can justifiably demand that their ability to reproduce their own labour power is not compromised. In Marx’s words: ‘What occurs here is an antinomy, right against right, both equally confirmed by the law of commodity exchange. 26 It follows that capitalist class domination is contestable on the grounds of the rules governing commodity exchange: workers can legitimately challenge the command of capitalists over production because labour power is not a commodity like any other.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.55 of 5 – based on 43 votes