By Jirà Pribán, Jiri Priban
This choice of essays brings jointly Zygmunt Bauman and a couple of across the world uncommon criminal students who study impact of Bauman's fresh works on social idea of legislation and socio-legal experiences. participants specialise in the idea that of 'liquid society' and its adoption via criminal students. the quantity opens through Bauman's research of fears and policing in 'liquid society' and keeps by means of studying the social and felony theoretical context and implications of Bauman's conception.
Read or Download Liquid Society and Its Law (Applied Legal Philosophy) PDF
Similar jurisprudence books
Reading the techniques of purpose and causation in euthanasia, this well timed new e-book explores a large number of disciplines, together with legal and clinical legislation, scientific ethics, philosophy and social coverage and indicates an alternate strategy to the only presently utilized by the courts, according to grading assorted different types of killing right into a formalized justificatory defence.
The Development of Persistent Criminality
The advance of continual criminal activity addresses essentially the most urgent difficulties of contemporary criminology: Why do a little participants turn into persistent, continual offenders? simply because continual offenders are accountable for nearly all of critical crimes dedicated, realizing which people becomes continual offenders is a vital step in aiding us increase interventions.
- Contesting Land and Custom in Ghana: State, Chief and the Citizen (AUP - Law, Governance, and Development R)
- Personality Rights in European Tort Law (The Common Core of European Private Law)
- CIMA - C05 Fundamentals of Ethics, Corporate Governance and Business Law: Study Text
- Information Technology and Lawyers: Advanced Technology in the Legal Domain, from Challenges to Daily Routine
- West's Encyclopedia of American Law - Sar-Ten
- LSAT PrepTest 31
Extra resources for Liquid Society and Its Law (Applied Legal Philosophy)
Example text
This quickly lost its ‘beyond left and right’ support once the prospects of recycling started to look remote and uncertain and the facilities of regular recycling appeared increasingly incapable of accommodating all who had fallen or never risen in the first place. Second, it designed and built new secure waste-disposal sites – a move certain to command ever growing popular support as the hopes of successful recycling fade, the traditional method of human-waste disposal (through exportation of surplus labour) ceases to be available, and the suspicion of universal disposability spreads wider and deepens as the horrors of ‘wasted humans’ come home to roost.
They would, said Tony Blair, ensure that it is ‘only people you really need to come in and work that get work permits’. As always in Tony Blair’s public statements, the words must have been rehearsed in focus groups, carefully chosen and weighed, with a view to striking a responsive chord in the mood of the electors. Ostensibly, they are aimed only at the aliens knocking at Britain’s door, but they would not amount to a convincing case if they did not chime in with the way ‘the population at large’, that is, a decisive majority of voters, think about underdogs, or (what, after years of cuts in social provisions, amounts to much the same) about ‘welfare recipients’ (that is, people who do not just possess, but also use their ‘social rights’).
They should be given if – and only if – the givers decide that giving them would accord with their interests, not on the grounds of the common humanity of the recipients. And the two sets of people – those who pass the second test and those who would pass the first – do not overlap. Perhaps the two tendencies signalled here are but two intimately related manifestations of the way politicians pander to (or beef up) ever more obsessive popular concerns with security; perhaps they both stem from the shift of balance between the perpetually present inclusivist and exclusionary systemic inclinations; or perhaps they are mutually unrelated phenomena, each subject to its own logic.