By Leszek Kolakowski, P. S. Falla
From thinker Leszek Kolakowski, one of many giants of twentieth-century highbrow heritage, comes this hugely infuential examine of Marxism. Written in exile, this 'prophetic paintings' offers, in response to the Library of Congress, 'the such a lot lucid and finished historical past of the origins, constitution, and posthumous improvement of the method of idea that had the best effect at the 20th century'. Kolakowski lines the highbrow foundations of Marxist suggestion from Plotonius via Lenin, Lukacs, Sartre and Mao. He unearths Marxism to be 'the maximum myth of our century ...an concept that started in Promethean humanism and culminated within the substantial tyranny of Stalinism'. In a super coda, he examines the cave in of foreign Communism in gentle of the final tumultuous a long time. major Currents of Marxism is still the necessary e-book in its box.
Read or Download Main Currents of Marxism - Vol 3 - The Breakdown PDF
Best communism & socialism books
The Bending Cross: A Biography of Eugene V. Debs
Enable the folk take center and wish far and wide, for the go is bending, the dead night is passing, and pleasure cometh with the morning. —Eugene Debs in 1918 Orator, organizer, self-taught pupil, presidential candidate, and prisoner, Eugene Debs’ lifelong dedication to the struggle for a greater international is chronicled during this remarkable biography via historian Ray Ginger.
Requiem for Marx via Yuri N. Maltsev (Paperback - Jun 1993)
- Communism in Ambush
- What's left?: radical politics in the postcommunist era
- The Faces of Janus: Marxism and Fascism in the Twentieth Century
- Between Equal Rights: A Marxist Theory Of International Law
- Reading Capital: The Complete Edition
- Mussolini
Additional info for Main Currents of Marxism - Vol 3 - The Breakdown
Example text
26 This explanation is partly and perhaps largely correct, namely, in that the mature Marx’s tendency in research led to a clear separation of criticism and theory. However, as I have said, I do not think that is the whole story: in the beginning, in his youthful project in economics, Marx had not distinguished between the positive treatment – the ‘real treatment’, as he put it – and the critical treatment, the study of the literature. And not only in the beginning: in the 22 February 1858 letter to Lassalle cited above, Marx wrote: The work I am presently concerned with is a Critique of Economic Categories or, if you like, a critical exposé of the system of the bourgeois economy.
The vocabulary and tone even suggest a methodology contrary to the Young-Hegelian methodology: I cannot, of course, avoid all critical consideration of other economists, in particular a polemic against Ricardo in as much as even he, qua bourgeois, cannot but commit blunders even from a strictly economic viewpoint. 24 Marx 1983c, p. 261. 25 Thus, in 1858 Marx had abandoned the Young-Hegelian identification of science with critique. He had overcome it on the level of methodological principles, but some remnants of it remain throughout his later work, including Capital.
Among Marx scholars who scarcely identify, if at all, with his philosophical and political thought, Schumpeter and Morishima are probably the ones who have most appreciated, in very different ways, the systematic grandeur of Marx’s work. Joan Robinson too. She thinks, incidentally, that Marx learned from Ricardo the scientific ideal of the system, of theory in the strong sense. I find it impossible to be convinced of this, despite the devoted admiration with which I read Mrs. Robinson, for two reasons.